200 Watt Brushless Gearhead Sizing

Estimate torque, speed, inertia and shaft stress at a 200W rated point. Review assumptions before requesting a configuration.

Request drawing reviewBy PrecisionGearheadPublished Reviewed

Rated-point sizing calculator

Mechanical power at rated speed.

Typical 3000 RPM base speed.

Assumed; confirm drive curve and peak duration.

Assumed stages: 1 up to 10:1; 2 up to 50:1.

Affects transmission efficiency.

Illustrative diameters; confirm drawing.

Kt values are illustrative assumptions.

Belt tension, wheel, or gear radial force.

Estimated Operating Point & Open Checks

Screening status:caution

Preliminary estimates, not catalog ratings. Efficiency, stage count, Kt and shaft material are assumed. Required load torque, peak duration, gear tooth capacity, fatigue, combined bearing loads and thermal limits remain unverified. Free-end beam slope is not seal-plane slope. See assumptions and method.

Output Speed
300.0 RPM
10:1 speed reduction
Rated-Point Torque Estimate
6.05 N·m
95% eff. (0.64 N·m motor)
Peak Torque Estimate
12.10 N·m
Assumed 2.0x peak capability
Inertia Ratiooptimal
1.4:1
Jref = 0.350 x10⁻⁴

Low modeled inertia ratio (1.4:1 <= 5:1). Low external reflected inertia in this simplified model; gearbox inertia, compliance and drive tuning remain unverified.

Shaft Stress MarginSF: 4.01

Combined von Mises stress: 89.7 MPa (Torsion 49.4 MPa, Bending 26.9 MPa).

Cantilever Deflection: 0.6 μmSlope: 0.22'
Illustrative static shaft margin (SF = 4.01 >= 2.0). Von Mises stress (89.7 MPa) is below the assumed 360 MPa yield strength; actual material, fatigue and geometry remain unverified.
Negligible shaft tip deflection (0.6 μm) and angular slope (0.22 arcmin). This is the free-end slope of an ideal solid cantilever fixed at the flange, not the slope at a seal or bearing. Seal runout and life require separate verification.
Combined Bearing Loadscaution

Radial: 220 N at L=15mm; axial: 35 N. Capacity: not verified.

Not verified: Fr=220 N, Fa=35 N at L=15 mm. Obtain the selected gearbox combined-load curve, output-speed limit and bearing-life calculation. No allowable radial capacity is inferred.
Thermal Dissipation10.0W Loss

Mechanical power: 190.0 W. Thermal derating: not established at 40°C.

Estimated gearbox loss at rated motor power is 10.0 W, using an assumed 95% efficiency. 100% on-time at 40°C does not establish a duty classification, housing temperature or torque derating. Obtain the manufacturer thermal envelope and verify the complete cycle.
Engineering Recommendations & Next Steps
  • Before selection, compare the estimated continuous and peak output torque against the gearbox catalog limits, peak duration, speed rating and the actual load torque-time cycle.
  • Verify combined radial and axial load capacity and life with the manufacturer; the shaft beam model excludes bearing and housing compliance.
  • Confirm thermal limits, motor/drive peak capability, mounting drawing, shaft material and fatigue. No configuration on this page is certified safe.

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Start inquiry opens your default email app.

Instant Chat

WhatsApp Engineering Support

Direct response from our engineering team.

Read Engineering Decision Report
Quick Navigation: Calculator, Schematics, Matrices, FAQs & RFQ

1. Decision summary: what 200W can tell you

Start with the operating point, then qualify a particular motor, drive and gearhead. The calculator is an estimate for comparing configurations. Its amber status means manufacturer verification is still required.

  • Power is not a torque rating. At 3000 RPM, 200W gives 0.637 N·m at the motor shaft. The 10:1 example gives 6.05 N·m only with the assumed 95% efficiency. See the derivation below and a documented 200W motor example.
  • Ratio trades speed for torque and inertia reduction. A 15:1 ratio gives 200 RPM and divides external load inertia by 225. Selection formula and limits.
  • Bearing capacity remains unknown. Shaft diameter cannot replace a model-specific speed/load-position curve. APEX catalog method.
  • Low beam deflection does not prove seal life. Check actual runout, alignment and seal geometry. SKF seal analysis.

2. Method, units and assumptions

Motor power is mechanical power at the rated operating point. P = Tω and ω = 2πn/60 give T = 9549 × P(kW) / n(RPM). Output speed is n/i and estimated output torque is T × i × η. Peak torque multiplies this by the entered peak factor; no duration or gearbox rating is inferred.

For the solid-shaft proxy, bending stress σb = 32 × Fr × L × Kt / (πd³), torsional shear τ = 16 × Tpeak × Kt / (πd³), and σvm = √(σb² + 3τ²). Use N, m and N·m to obtain Pa; divide by 10⁶ for MPa. Static yield margin is the assumed 360 MPa / σvm. These equations exclude axial stress, fatigue and the actual bearing support.

Model assumptions and excluded checks
ItemAssumption usedRequired before approval
Efficiency / stagesPlanetary: 95% / 1 stage at i≤10; 91% / 2 at i≤50; 85% / 3 above 50. Other architectures: fixed illustrative efficiencies.Actual catalog efficiency map, available ratio and stage count; APEX AB lists 100:1 as two stages, showing why model bands must not be treated as specifications
ShaftSolid round cantilever; E=206 GPa; yield=360 MPa; Kt=1.2–2.2 illustrativeActual material, section, fatigue, bearing spacing and housing compliance
InertiaExternal output inertia / i², divided by rotor inertia; both entered in 10⁻⁴ kg·m²Gearbox/coupling inertia, acceleration torque and tuning
Thermal / bearingLoss estimate only; capacity and derating unknownComplete cycle, mounting, ambient and manufacturer load/thermal limits

3. Read the calculation chain

Diagram 1: Power to torque
Diagram 1: Power to torque200 W + rated RPMT = P / ωMotor torque

Changing rated RPM assumes a different 200W rated operating point, not constant-power operation of one motor at any speed.

Diagram 2: Transmission
Diagram 2: TransmissionMotor torque× ratio × efficiencyOutput estimate

At 10:1 and η=0.95, the 3000 RPM example gives 300 RPM and 6.05 N·m; actual gearbox limits apply.

Diagram 3: Reflected inertia
Diagram 3: Reflected inertiaOutput load JL÷ ratio²Reflected JL

Example: JL=35, i=10 and Jm=0.25 gives 1.4:1, with inertias entered in 10⁻⁴ kg·m².

Diagram 4: Shaft stress proxy
Diagram 4: Shaft stress proxyPeak T and Fr × LBending + torsionStatic yield proxy

σvm = √(σb² + 3τ²). A static margin excludes fatigue and actual gear tooth capacity.

Diagram 5: Thermal uncertainty
Diagram 5: Thermal uncertainty200 × (1 − η)Estimated loss WThermal review

A heat generation estimate cannot establish surface temperature without heat transfer and installation data.

Diagram 6: Backlash allowance
Diagram 6: Backlash allowanceAngle + load radiusr × arcmin / 3437.75Linear lost motion

This geometric allowance excludes torsional compliance, runout and control error.

Diagram 7: Stage and ratio tradeoff
Diagram 7: Stage and ratio tradeoffHigher reductionLower output speedRecheck limits

Available stage count and ratio partitioning are manufacturer specific; the model uses simplified bands.

Diagram 8: Cantilever boundary
Diagram 8: Cantilever boundaryFixed at flangeFr at distance LFree-end δ and θ

δ=Fr L³/(3EI), θ=Fr L²/(2EI), I=πd⁴/64. Free-end slope is not slope at the seal.

Diagram 9: Fitment review
Diagram 9: Fitment reviewMotor drawingPilot + bore + boltsAdapter approval

No universal 60mm or NEMA frame compatibility, ISO fit class or shaft runout is inferred from the power rating.

Diagram 10: Braking energy
Diagram 10: Braking energyLoad motion cycleEnergy + peak powerDrive limits

A resistor value cannot be chosen from the 200W motor rating alone. Use the drive manufacturer’s braking guidance.

Diagram 11: Lubrication review
Diagram 11: Lubrication reviewSpeed + load + heatSupplier lubricantMaintenance plan

No lubricant temperature range, cleanroom approval or relubrication interval is assumed without the product specification.

4. Compare ratios, architectures and evidence

Calculated rows use 200W at 3000 RPM and a 2.5x peak assumption. They are not catalog ratings. High ratios can exceed gearbox torque capacity even when the motor has only 200W.

Calculated planetary ratio comparison
Ratio :1Assumed stagesAssumed ηRPMRated-point N·mPeak estimate N·m
3195%10001.813.63
5195%6003.026.05
10195%3006.0512.10
15291%2008.6917.38
30291%10017.3834.76
50291%6028.9657.93
100385%3054.11108.22
Architecture selection and open checks
ArchitectureModel ηDecision tradeoffConfirm
Inline planetary85–95%Compact coaxial layout; ratio and stiffness matterActual backlash, inertia, torque, speed and efficiency
Right-angle hypoid / bevel90%Can help packaging; adds angle-drive cost and lossesActual hypoid or bevel design, lubrication and load limits
Parallel spur85%Alternative shaft layout and transmission designActual stage efficiency and reversing lost motion
Strain-wave70%Consider for reduction and positioning needsAvailable ratio, hysteresis, compliance and fatigue rating
Manufacturer evidence: known / unknown
ReferenceKnown from linked sourceUnknown for your assembly
Oriental Motor BMU manual [source below]Manual §13.3 (p.42): 200W, 3000 RPM, 0.637 N·m rated and 1.15 N·m instantaneous peak; these are motor-shaft valuesSelected motor/drive/gearhead combination and mounting suitability
APEX AB engineering data [source below]Uses model-, speed- and load-position-specific dataApplicable radial/axial rating until size, ratio, speed and position are chosen
Oriental Motor BLH lineup [source below]Checked US lineup lists 15–100WNo verified BLH5200 200W pairing; do not substitute it for BMU

Evidence reviewed 11 November 2026. No cross-brand interchangeable torque, backlash, shaft diameter or radial capacity is claimed. BMU manual · APEX catalog · BLH lineup.

5. Risks, costs and mitigations

Failure and mismatch review
RiskTrigger / consequenceAction or alternative
Torque or fatigue overloadPeak multiplier or a high ratio exceeds actual ratingsObtain torque-time cycle and catalog limits; change ratio, frame size or motion profile
Overhung / axial loadWheel or belt load overloads bearings; free-end beam model misses support deformationRequest combined-load life check; move load inward or use external support
Thermal accumulationLong loaded runs, enclosure or warm ambientVerify manufacturer thermal envelope and mounting; consider improved conduction or another frame
Positioning mismatchBacklash and compliance exceed the required lost motionSet an error budget; evaluate lower backlash, output feedback or direct drive
Assembly and sourcing costAdapter, brake, support bearing or premium accuracy increases cost and lead timeGet a drawing-based quote including accessories and lifecycle maintenance
Vertical / regenerative motionGravity or deceleration requires holding and energy managementUse an application-specific brake and drive review; power class alone is insufficient

6. Thermal and duty boundaries

At 95% assumed efficiency the estimated gearbox loss is 10W; at 91% it is 18W. These values exclude motor/drive losses, no-load losses and efficiency variation. Neither a housing temperature nor a permissible torque derating factor is calculated.

On-time percentage does not describe starting, braking, cycle duration or cooling. Supply the full torque-speed-time cycle and check the selected manufacturer’s mounting and duty requirements. BMU operating requirements. A gearbox with lower efficiency may require a different mounting or duty solution; request thermal evidence before committing to it.

7. Reproducible application examples

These are hypothetical operating points, not measured customer case studies. Each uses the same validated inputs and equations as the tool. No service life, housing temperature, settling time, savings or load-carrying approval is claimed.

200 watt brushless gearhead calculator execution showing 300 RPM, 6.05 N·m rated-point estimate and unverified bearing and thermal limits
Actual software execution captured 11 November 2026; floating contact control hidden for this capture only. Reproduce with Continuous Conveyor: 200W, 3000 RPM, peak factor 2x, 10:1 planetary, assumed η=95%, 14mm keyed solid shaft (Kt=2.2), Fr=220N at L=15mm, Fa=35N, JL=35 and Jm=0.25 (both in 10⁻⁴ kg·m²), 100% on-time, 40°C, moderate service context. E=206 GPa and yield=360 MPa are assumed; no automatic service factor is applied. Results: 300 RPM, 6.05 N·m rated-point estimate, 12.10 N·m peak estimate, 1.40:1 inertia ratio, 10W loss. This is reproducible software evidence, not a physical gearhead test, application approval or customer testimonial.

AGV / AMR Drive

200W at 3000 RPM; 15:1 planetary; η=91% assumed; peak factor 2.5x. Shaft Ø14mm, keyed; Fr=480N at L=18mm; Fa=50N. JL=120, Jm=0.25 (10⁻⁴ kg·m²); on-time 60%, ambient 30°C.

200 RPM · 8.69 N·m rated-point estimate · 21.72 N·m peak estimate · 2.13:1 inertia ratio · 18.0W estimated loss.

Next: select this preset in the calculator, then request bearing, torque-cycle and thermal verification. For vertical motion, add holding-brake review; for a wheel, add shock-load and support review.

Pick-and-Place Gantry

200W at 3000 RPM; 5:1 planetary; η=95% assumed; peak factor 3x. Shaft Ø14mm, clamp; Fr=90N at L=12mm; Fa=25N. JL=5, Jm=0.25 (10⁻⁴ kg·m²); on-time 40%, ambient 25°C.

600 RPM · 3.02 N·m rated-point estimate · 9.07 N·m peak estimate · 0.80:1 inertia ratio · 10.0W estimated loss.

Next: select this preset in the calculator, then request bearing, torque-cycle and thermal verification. For vertical motion, add holding-brake review; for a wheel, add shock-load and support review.

Continuous Conveyor

200W at 3000 RPM; 10:1 planetary; η=95% assumed; peak factor 2x. Shaft Ø14mm, keyed; Fr=220N at L=15mm; Fa=35N. JL=35, Jm=0.25 (10⁻⁴ kg·m²); on-time 100%, ambient 40°C.

300 RPM · 6.05 N·m rated-point estimate · 12.10 N·m peak estimate · 1.40:1 inertia ratio · 10.0W estimated loss.

Next: select this preset in the calculator, then request bearing, torque-cycle and thermal verification. For vertical motion, add holding-brake review; for a wheel, add shock-load and support review.

Rotary Indexer

200W at 3000 RPM; 50:1 planetary; η=91% assumed; peak factor 2.5x. Shaft Ø16mm, clamp; Fr=160N at L=15mm; Fa=120N. JL=320, Jm=0.25 (10⁻⁴ kg·m²); on-time 40%, ambient 25°C.

60 RPM · 28.96 N·m rated-point estimate · 72.41 N·m peak estimate · 0.51:1 inertia ratio · 18.0W estimated loss.

Next: select this preset in the calculator, then request bearing, torque-cycle and thermal verification. For vertical motion, add holding-brake review; for a wheel, add shock-load and support review.

8. Deflection and positioning allowances

For an ideal 300N radial load, a solid shaft fixed at the flange and E=206 GPa, the table below is computed directly from δ=Fr L³/(3EI). Doubling distance multiplies deflection by eight; this does not model the actual bearing/housing system.

Ideal free-end deflection (μm), Fr=300N
L (mm)Ø12mmØ14mmØ16mmØ19mm
50.10.00.00.0
100.50.30.20.1
151.60.90.50.3
203.82.11.20.6
257.54.02.41.2
3012.97.04.12.0

At a 30mm pitch radius, 5 arcmin backlash gives 30 × 5 / 3437.75 = 0.0436mm (43.6μm) geometric lost motion. Add compliance, runout and feedback error to build a total error budget. The calculator’s 15/40μm and 3.5/6 arcmin bands are illustrative thresholds, not seal standards or accuracy guarantees. Seal behavior requires its own review.

9. Questions by decision type

Sizing & motion

How much torque does a 200 watt brushless gearhead produce?

200W is motor mechanical power, not gearbox torque. At a rated 3000 RPM, T = P / omega gives 0.637 N·m. A 10:1 gearbox at an assumed 95% efficiency gives 300 RPM and 6.05 N·m. Check the gearbox torque limit separately.

Does a 2.5x peak multiplier apply to every 200W motor?

No. It is an editable assumption. Use the selected motor and drive peak-current curve, permitted peak duration and gearbox acceleration torque rating before specifying a peak output.

How does gear ratio change reflected inertia?

External inertia at the output is reflected to the motor as JL / i². Divide this by motor rotor inertia for the displayed ratio. Gearbox inertia, couplings and compliance are excluded, so this ratio does not prove control stability.

Is an inertia ratio below 10:1 a guaranteed pass?

No. The 5:1, 10:1 and 20:1 bands are illustrative screening bands. Check the drive guidance, acceleration torque, mechanical resonance and settling measurements for the actual machine.

Can increasing the ratio always solve an inertia problem?

A higher ratio reduces external reflected inertia but also reduces output speed and increases estimated output torque. Recheck the required speed, available ratio, gearbox torque rating, gearbox inertia and cycle time together.

Is 200W available at every speed in the calculator?

Each calculation is a separate motor rated operating point. Changing rated RPM assumes the motor supplies 200W at that RPM; it does not describe the speed curve of one motor. Below base speed, use that motor’s torque limit rather than assuming constant power.

Mechanics & interfaces

What is the radial load limit of a 14mm shaft?

Shaft diameter alone cannot establish a bearing or gearbox radial load limit. Request the selected model’s radial and axial combined-load curves at the actual output speed, load position and target life. The tool deliberately leaves capacity unverified.

Where is the calculated shaft slope measured?

It is the free-end slope of an ideal solid circular cantilever fixed at the flange. It is not slope at the seal or bearing. Actual bearing spacing, housing compliance and seal position are needed for those displacements.

Does DIN 3760 impose the tool’s 3.5 or 6 arcmin thresholds?

No universal DIN angular limit is claimed here. These values are illustrative screening bands. Seal suppliers specify permissible runout and misalignment for particular seal designs and operating conditions.

Does a static shaft safety factor prove fatigue life?

No. The calculation uses an assumed 360 MPa yield strength and an illustrative stress concentration factor. Material treatment, actual notches, load reversals, surface finish and fatigue endurance need a separate design check.

Can the solid-shaft model validate a flange or hollow shaft?

No. A flange selection shows only an equivalent solid-diameter illustration. Hollow sections, bolt preload, bolt circle, flange bending and actual bearing support require their own calculation.

Is a clamping hub always better than a keyway?

A smooth shaft can reduce notch effects, but clamp slip torque, surface condition, bore tolerance and assembly torque must be checked. The tool’s Kt values are comparison assumptions, not values supplied by DIN 6885.

Thermal & drive

How much heat does a 200W gearbox generate?

At the assumed rated input, gearbox loss is 200 × (1 − efficiency). At 95% it is 10W; at 91% it is 18W. These are loss estimates, not housing temperatures, and exclude motor and driver losses.

Does 40% on-time establish S5 duty?

No. Duty classification also depends on the load-time sequence, starting, braking, cycle duration and thermal behavior. Supply the complete cycle; the on-time percentage alone cannot establish permissible overload.

What temperature derating should I apply?

Use the manufacturer’s ambient, mounting and thermal torque envelope. This tool cannot derive a universal derating factor or housing temperature from efficiency, on-time and ambient temperature alone.

Is supply current the same as motor phase current?

No. DC input current can be estimated from electrical input power divided by bus voltage; phase current also depends on torque constant, modulation and the drive’s RMS or peak convention. Use the selected motor/drive specifications.

Can a generic braking resistor be specified from 200W?

No. Compute the energy of the full load and motion cycle, then use the drive manufacturer’s braking circuit limits, resistance range, peak power, energy and average power ratings. The motor power class alone is insufficient.

Selection & sourcing

Are the application examples measured customer case studies?

No. They are hypothetical, reproducible operating points calculated with the same model as the tool. They contain no measured life, temperature, accuracy, savings or application approval.

How do I convert backlash into a linear allowance?

At radius r, lost motion is approximately r × angle_arcmin / 3437.75. At a 30mm radius, 5 arcmin corresponds to 43.6μm. This excludes compliance, runout and control error and is not a total accuracy specification.

What should I send with a gearhead RFQ?

Send motor and drive part numbers, rated and peak torque with duration, ratio, required output speed and load torque cycle, radial/axial forces and positions, target life, mounting drawing, shaft interface, ambient conditions, backlash and accuracy needs. Include the tool summary as preliminary estimates.

10. Sources and uncertainty register

Reviewed . Manufacturer documents apply to their own products; they do not certify this calculator. Kinematic and beam values are calculated examples. No measured performance dataset is used. Review this guide every six months or when a linked manufacturer specification changes; update the review date only after checking the content.

  1. Oriental Motor BMU 200 / 300 / 400 W operating manual

    A documented 200W motor example; consult its specifications, duty and installation requirements. This is not a universal 200W rating.

  2. Oriental Motor: calculating load inertia

    External load inertia reflects through the square of the gear ratio. Acceptable inertia depends on the motor and motion profile.

  3. APEX Dynamics AB engineering data

    Model-specific torque, speed and load data; permissible radial load depends on output speed and load position. Use the selected size and ratio.

  4. SKF: Seal analysis pays

    Seal performance depends on shaft-to-bore misalignment and dynamic runout. This source does not establish a universal angular seal limit.

  5. Oriental Motor BLH product lineup

    The checked US lineup lists 15–100W. It is not evidence for the previously claimed BLH5200 200W pairing.

Not established here: catalog load capacity, fatigue life, universal DIN seal angular limits, ISO fit tolerances, lubricant life, thermal derating, drive braking resistance or interchangeability across manufacturers. Obtain current part-specific documents and written confirmation.

11. Prepare a reviewable RFQ

Copy the calculator summary and add motor/drive part numbers, actual required load torque and speed, peak duration, complete cycle and target life. Attach a drawing with pilot diameter, bolt pattern, shaft/bore tolerances, load position and bearing support. Specify ambient conditions, brake, backlash and accuracy requirements.

If inputs are unknown, send the drawing and motion description first. Ask for a configuration and the missing rating checks. The estimate is a starting point for that review.

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Start inquiry opens your default email app.

Instant Chat

WhatsApp Engineering Support

Direct response from our engineering team.

12. Selection playbook

  1. Confirm 200W mechanical rated point, motor speed and drive capability.
  2. Choose a ratio for required output speed; estimate torque with explicit efficiency.
  3. Compare actual required load torque, peak duration and cycle against motor and gearbox ratings.
  4. Verify combined forces, bearing life, shaft geometry and fatigue using the assembly drawing.
  5. Check thermal envelope, fitment, lost motion, brake and regeneration needs.
  6. Obtain a documented configuration, quote and application verification before ordering.
Return to the sizing calculator